this game was banned in my school because people would just play it over and over again in the library
motherfuckin thank you
this would be really fucking cool if my arrow keys would fucking work.
THIS IS PERFECT
this one time in middle school we had to get into groups of 3 and do skits about ancient europe in history so these boys do theirs about christianity and they get a huge fuckin box and spraypaint “the bible” on this side to make it look like a book right i’m already laughing so the two dudes stand up there with the box and talk for a bit and we’re all wondering where the third dude is and thEN SUDDENLY SOMEBODY PUNCHES THROUGH THE BOX AND THE KID STUMBLES OUT DRESSED AS JESUS AND STARTS RAPPING ABOUT HOW HOT THE DESERT IS AND HOW MUCH NAILS IN YOUR HANDS HURT AND THERES SWEARING IN THE SONG BUT ONE OF THE BOYS HAS THIS TAPE RECORDER WITH THE *BLEEP* SFX ON IT AND HES HITTING IT W PERFECT TIMING IT WAS THE GREATEST THING I HAVE EVER WITNESSED
FUCKING WATCH THIS! FUNNIER- OR EQUALLY FUNNY - WITH THE ACTUAL GAG REEL! #DEAD #LOKI WITH THE RAIN ON YOUR PARADE #TONY & THE ELEMENTS
OMG THIS IS FUCKING PERFECT.
i aM LITERALLY CRYING OFGMM THIS IS THE FUCKING BEST
AND YOUR FRIEND STEVE
The end is perfection in every way.
|(Our Japanese restaurant is near a school that annually hosts an anime convention. So, it’s fairly common to have cosplayers among our customers at the time of the con. The owner is okay with it as long as they don’t annoy the other customers. On this day, we seat twelve cosplayers and, later, I seat three young customers near them.)|
|Young Customer #1:||“What is this? Why are those guys costumed?”|
|Me:||“Oh, there’s a large anime convention ongoing at the local school. It’s rather common to see them at the times of the gathering.”|
|Young Customer #1:||*chuckles* “Yeah, what a bunch of dorks.”|
|Young Customer #2:||“Total nerds.”||(Since there are no other free tables and they didn’t pre-order a table, they sit near the cosplayers while mocking them under their breath. In the meantime, a cosplayer of Pikachu is talking somewhat loudly on his phone.)|
|Young Customer #2:||*waves at me* “Hey, you! Tell those dorks to shut up!”|
|Halo Cosplayer:||“Oh, I’m sorry, sir.” *to ‘Pikachu’* “Dude, not so loud. You’re bothering people.”|
|Pikachu Cosplayer:||“What? Oh, sorry to bother you guys.” *starts talking again, but much quieter*|
|Young Customer #3:||“Yeah, that’s right. Shut up, you virgin nerd!”|
|Young Customer #1:||“Go back to the library, virgins!”||(At this point, I warn the owner about the behavior of the younger customers. He immediately goes to their table.)|
|Owner:||“What seems to be the problem?”|
|Young Customer #1:||“It’s not our fault. Those nerds started to insult us! We’re not going to stay here and do nothing!”|
|Owner:||“My staff told me the contrary, actually.”|
|Young Customer #3:||“What?! That b***h waitress is lying!”|
|Owner:||“Sir, I won’t allow you to insult my staff or customers. Those cosplayers were extremely polite and quiet during their meals, unlike you. If someone must be thrown out, it’s you.”||(In the blink of an eye, one of the young customers gets up and tries to grab the owner. However, to our surprise, one of the cosplayers playing Batman grabs him by the hair, slams him on the table and holds him still.)|
|Young Customer #1:||“OW! That f***ing hurts! Who the f*** do you think you are, you motherf***er?!”|
|Batman Cosplayer:||*in a raspy tone* “I am vengeance. I am the night. I am… Batman.”||(The two other customers begin to yell, but quickly shut up when all the cosplayers get up and surround them, showing that most of them are clearly larger than them. The mall security arrests the bad customers, and the cosplayers leave after apologizing for the trouble. However, it’s not before we snap a picture with them. Now, we frequently joke about that time when Batman, Pikachu and Master Chief saved the restaurant!)|
Midoshichikiari, Mekafutaka at your service!
just call me Tofu
Just call me Shiriki…
That’s Miku to you
not even my name can be as kawaii as the animes
Takadoshikatakuki Zukutochiz, here!
omg i love it way too much
1. This picture of Chicago Christians who showed up at a gay pride parade to apologize for homophobia in the Church.
2. …and the reaction from the parade
I strongly suggest you click that link. I’m pretty sure there’s a few ninjas cutting onions in my room, now…
now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes
The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.
But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.
The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!
Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.
BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.
Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?
Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?
So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.
Thank you for your time.
Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.
Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.
And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.
So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.
hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.
I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe
Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.
The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?
On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.
Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?
Actually, Mr. Godot!!
Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…
If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!
Aah… these M&M’s droplets
So colourful… reminds me of the days of my youth!
the red ones remind me of my hemorroids… *cough*
I have found some new evidence though the original image source suggesting this second image has been tampered with!
This image clearly shows candies that correspond to the colours commonly found in M & M s… The edge of the bowl is visible, as are some ‘M’ symbols, if you look closely.
This suggests the second image in the original is perhaps just a fabrication based off of the second.
It is clearly a fraud!
You shouldn’t jump the “fraud” gun just yet, Wright. If your source is really the corresponding photo to the first, then the “gumball” picture in question might not be at fault. To put it bluntly, it might just be a copycat.
To put it another way, this could just be a case of a mistaken and mismatched photoset..
With all the evidence provided, I think it’s safe to assume this case could be solved: The candies in the second photograph are not M&Ms, but the photo itself was not exactly tampered with. It was just a completely separate photo of separate candies, possibly just misplaced in this set by the original poster, who was completely unaware of the mismatch!
Hold it right there everyone.
A PUZZLE HIDDEN IN THAT BOWL OF MISLEADING CANDY.